评估非虚构文本中的论证
Evaluating Arguments in Non-Fiction
评估非虚构文本中的论证与主张——判断推理是否严谨、证据是否相关且充分，区分事实与观点，并识别偏见、宣传和修辞手法。
Evaluate arguments and claims in non-fiction texts — assess whether reasoning is sound, evidence is relevant and sufficient, distinguish between fact and opinion, and recognise bias, propaganda, and rhetorical techniques
学习证据 / Evidence
- 识别论证性文本中的主要主张，并评估所提供证据是否充分。
- 识别逻辑谬误，或那些用以转移注意力、掩盖论证缺陷的不相关证据。
- 比较同一议题上的两种对立论点，并有理有据地评析哪一种更有说服力。
- Identify the main claim in an argument text and evaluate whether the evidence presented is sufficient
- Spot logical fallacies or irrelevant evidence introduced to distract from weak reasoning
- Compare two opposing arguments on the same issue and evaluate which is more convincing, with reasons
评估问题 / Assessment
当{{name}}阅读一篇有说服力的文章（如社论或演讲稿）时，他们能否识别其中使用的修辞手法，评估论证在逻辑上是否成立，并解释哪些内容可能存在偏见或误导？
When {{name}} reads a persuasive piece — like an editorial or a speech — can they identify the rhetorical techniques being used, evaluate whether the argument is logically sound, and explain what might be biased or misleading?